Bug Attack – No One Gets Fired for Buying Microsoft
Curiouser and curiouser. Why would a bug want to copy a legitimate Microsoft OS DLL into the root directory of a computer and then rename it to a random string with an EXE extension?
More importantly, why would anyone be browsing the internet from their server console? Some people really shouldn’t be allowed to operate their own computer equipment. Microsoft, I know you’ve taken plenty of heat lately on security issues, and that IE7 is actually pretty secure provided it is
But if a user is even slightly incompetent or credulous–as the average human is–then within an alarmingly short period of time most Windows-based computers are compromised. Add this to the many shortcomings of the bloated server offerings and unwieldy desktop offerings and I am more satisfied with my decision to use Linux on my laptop every day. And yet what alternative do we have in the business space? I can’t sell open source business solutions to save my life! People always complain that they aren’t compatible enough, can’t be integrated easily enough. And if I do happen to sell an open source–or even a non-Microsoft closed source–solution and ANYTHING goes wrong with it I get blamed for the recommendation. You sold me this crap. It’s your fault, says Mr. Unhappy Customer. In the really old days there was a phrase: “No one gets fired for buying IBM.” |

Curiouser and curiouser. Why would a bug want to copy a legitimate Microsoft OS DLL into the root directory of a computer and then rename it to a random string with an EXE extension?



If I am so great why don’t more people buy me? hmm…
Open source is hard to Admin, which is why us dummy admins tend to go for dummy MS. At least that’s always been my impression. Of course, I’ve never looked at Linux in my life so I may be wrong about that.
I completely cleaned a MS machine of 180 known threats the other day. Then, after one day where the user had checked their webmail and looked at a couple of real estate sites I got to clean another 76 off the machine. Maybe… we should go back to paper and pencil.
Apple: because you are too damned expensive, silly.
Rich: Open source has gotten easier to admin in recent years. And there are some things you can do in Linux that are either expensive, technically difficult, or just impossible in Windows. Compiz-fusion, for instance, is an amazing peek into the future of gui, or perhaps is nothing but fluff.
Whatever.
http://www.SafeTinspector.com runs on a Debian Linux box which never uses more than 128MB of ram, has only a 2GB hard drive (of which 1GB is taken up with pictures) and is not allowed to use more than 1Ghz of CPU resources.
I would be very interested in seeing a Windows server operate so efficiently.
Trackbacks