Wordpress Themes

Big Fat Gay Wedding


    My wife Heather, my daughter Samantha and I attended the wedding of Leslie and Colleen at the Cleary International Center in Windsor, Ontario this past Saturday: January 21, 2006.

    Leslie, Heather’s aunt and a prominent Lesbian in the Detroit gay community, met Colleen about a year ago and, from what I’ve been told, they soon fell in love and very quickly decided that they wished to be married.

    In Michigan, we not only don’t have legalized gay marriage, but our sizeable and vocal religious conservative movement put forth and passed a ballot initiative creating a state constitutional amendment specifically prohibiting same-sex marriages. The ACLU has, however, won a lawsuit preserving domestic partner benefits such as medical insurance and inheritance rights. Even this bit of progress is in danger, however, as there are those attempting to defeat this newly won protection in the courts and legislature.

    This state of affairs is not so dire across the border in Canada however. There gay marriage is the law of the land as of late June, 2005. Not through any manipulatively worded ballot initiative, either. In the House of Commons gay marriage was legalized in a 158 to 133 vote.

    So when Colleen and Leslie decided that they wished to be wed, there was only one option available to them: a brief migration to the land of the Maple leaf. Windsor, Ontario is Detroit’s sister city; a relatively small and painfully trendy town on the other side of the Detroit river. It is but a quick trip across the Ambassador Bridge (or through the Detroit-Windsor tunnel, if you are a mole). Not from our area? Windsor was famously featured in Micheal Moore’s documentary “Bowling for Columbine”, where it was revealed that the only murders there seem to be purpetrated by visiting Detroiters. Spread the love, Metro Detroit!

    So there was a wedding. The reverend…or pastor…or whatever the fellow was, conducted the ceremony in what I feel was an overly political tone. Seemed as if his sermon was more about gay marriage than their marriage, which I don’t think helps the cause.
    When the struggle is the message, then the struggle goes on. But if the marriage is the message, then the struggle is won.
    In any case, it was lovely in its own right, especially after the sermon was behind them and the vows were exchanged.
    Below is a picture of the newly married couple immediately after being pronounced wife… and wife.

the honorable…

Mrs. and Mrs.

the couple at the reception

    After the ceremony came the reception. The most remarkable thing about this gay wedding reception was how much it seemed just like any other wedding reception in America (or Ontario, as the case may be). There was a wedding couple dance followed by a wedding party dance.
    There was good food, of which I particularly enjoyed the pork roast with peach sauce and the garlic potatos.
    People tapped their glasses with spoons to goad the couple into kissing.
    We all ate cake.
    The DJ made us dance the Hustle, the Macarena, YMCA, and then all those willing to do so proceeded to boogie down to Cool and the Gang’s Celebration.
    People got drunk.
    People made fools of themselves.
    Eventually everyone went on their merry way and the evening drew to a close. We retired to our large-party-discounted hotel room at the adjoining Hilton, where Heather and I faught the attempts of the overly soft mattress to devour us whole while our daughter slept peacefully on the neighboring bed.

    In the morning I awoke to the ironic realization that our hotel, where the majority of the wedding guests stayed, was serving as a local launching point for last minute Conservative party campaigning in Windsor. Some party bigwig appeared in the lobby while I was passing through; he proceeded to photo op and rally his troops.
    Such is the difference between American and Canadian politics that we saw no body guards, and barely a fuss was made. Anyone know who this fellow was? Everyone standing in line to see him had “Harper” shirts on. (Stephen Harper is now the Prime Minister elect for the Conservative party.)
    I leave you with these images from the reception. Notice the lovely Detroit skyline, complete with Canadian Coast Guard cutter. Ironic…the only way to get a good view of Detroit is from another country.

Wanna see any of these pictures closer up? Click HERE.

Posted in Uncategorized by SafeTinspector on January 24th, 2006  |  17 comments

Commentary

Leave a response »

Sarah said on January 24th, 2006

nice ceremony. shame about the pastor. my cousin married her life partner last year. Marriage rights have been a battle here in Oregon as well. i am all for people to get married, if you love someone, you should be able to. my father and mother are.. staunchly against it. (i just don’t get why)

Tomas_Quinones said on January 24th, 2006

Sarah, you’re in Oregon? I’m in Milwaukie!

SafeT: Well Said: “When the struggle is the message, then the struggle goes on. But if the marriage is the message, then the struggle is won.”

I find your opinion intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

-Tomas “I’m not THAT Krazy” Quinones

Brian said on January 24th, 2006

Leslie, is a stand-up comedian. I’ve seen her many times at Ridley’s. She’s quite funny from what I remember.

Crack said on January 24th, 2006

Was it funny every time someone said “gay” like on all those popular sitcoms? Like on Will and Grace it is just so funny when the gay guy acts gay. I just can’t stop laughing. It is like the funniest thing I have ever heard even though it has been done 20,000 times. yeah…right..

Vicky Hawthorne said on January 24th, 2006

Wow, your city skyline is beautiful. And your words “When the struggle is the message, then the struggle goes on. But if the marriage is the message, then the struggle is won.” and beautiful too.

Davecat said on January 25th, 2006

Chalk up another point for Canada, I guess. ;-)

SafeTinspector said on January 25th, 2006

Sarah:Older folks often have unsupportable moral codes. That is, they think something is right or wrong simply because it is right or wrong. They not only can’t come up with justification for their positions, they don’t even see why such a justification is necessary.

Tomas:My newsletter is currently in alpha circulation. Nothing but dominant male wolves…

Brian:Yeah, she’s an amateur stand-up in addition to running various outreach programs and social services for the gay community. I cought her act once, and thought it was pretty funny.

Crack:Some people were funny. But the funny was because they had humor, not because they were gay. You’re right, though. So many of the gay-themed comedy in the public spotlight still concentrate on the supposed humor of BEING gay as opposed to just concentrating on humor.

Vicky:You can only see that beauty from Canada. At no point does someone in Metro-Detroit see the skyline as anything other than peppered with blight.

DaveCat:GOOOOOOOAALL!!!

SheBah said on January 25th, 2006

Safe T,
Why was one partner dressed as a bride and one as a groom? Isn’t that a bit of a contradiction of what its all about?

SafeTinspector said on January 25th, 2006

sexybeauty:In Leslie’s defence, her jacket was purple velour. Otherwise, I suppose they wore whatever they felt most comfortable in. Leslie is a masculine lesbian in many ways, and probably doesn’t like wearing dresses.

Red Hot Sexy Papa said on January 25th, 2006

Love the last picture!

redhead83402 said on January 26th, 2006

Beautiful picture, that last one is! Absolutely striking!

SafeTinspector said on January 26th, 2006

RHSP and RedHead:
Detroit can look pretty…. at night…. from across a river.

Sarah said on January 26th, 2006

57 isn’t that old. and you’d think being children of the 60′s era that they would be more open minded about it. well.. i thought at least my mom would be.

Sarah said on January 26th, 2006

yeah.. and that pic of detroit is pretty stunning. if i do say so myself.

SUE LOU said on January 28th, 2006

Personally, I am happy when anyone finds love, as it is hard to come by, and, I think that gay couples should be able to be joined legally, but I do object to that joining being called marriage. Call it something else, partnership, co-mates, cohabitation contract, whatever, but just not marriage. Marriage by definition is between a man and a woman, period! If you start expanding the definition to include same-sex couples, why not two men and one woman, two women and one man, a man and a goat, a woman and a kitty cat. Why I heard that the other day a British tourist went to Australia and married her favorite dolphin. It was not legal, but it could be, why not?

Joe, I like your sentence about struggle too, it does not sound like you, it seems too jingliestic to be you who said it. But it is a nice sentiment. You could substitute any number of causes for the word marriage and inspire a whole movement.

Your picture of the Detroit skyline is beautiful. But it is only a façade. When you travel just a few blocks from the beautiful buildings that line the waterfront, you quickly come to the decay, boarded up buildings, and graffiti that occupies far too much of Detroit.

Leslie said on February 27th, 2006

Hey Joe…what a beautiful observation. I agree the service was too political. Since so much of my real job is about the political struggles of our community we had wanted our ceremony to be just about the wedding – but it seemed awkward to interupt him.
Hmmmm, masucline lesbian? I am six foot tall and still too short for my weight. but masculine? I am a strong minded woman who works hard, loves softball and power tools. but masculine? I am also phenominal at cuddling and could spend hours in my garden.
Clothes do not make the person. But Marsha made my clothes. Lavender silk pants, champagne silk camisole and a purple velvet jacket…never saw a groom in that much silk!
Pigeon-holing folks into certain labels because of clothes is just another means used to judge people by our own standards – not what they are comfortable in. Oh, I almost forgot the best part…I had lavender cowboy boots that exactly matched my silk pants…I was stylin’!!!
I am new at blogging – this is my first – so I apologize for the rambling on.
Marriage is defined as between one man and one woman only when a state passes a law that says that. No where else was it listed before the religous right started spreading hate in an effort to raise more money and get folks to the polls in an effort to get candidates supportive to their cause elected – or appointed as in the case of our president. What gets confused is what body has the legal control over marriage. It is the government. All Colleen and I want to do is go to Oakland County courts, get a marriage license, and have someone in Michigan (perhaps the mayor of Ferndale) perform the service. We don’t want or need a church to be involved. Churches only provide a space for people to get married – it still has to go through the governement.
By the way – those who think I am funny – thanks – I have another comedy competition this Weds. at Mark Ridley’s – come out and cheer me on. I don’t know if I am still funny now that I am married.

SafeTinspector said on February 27th, 2006

Leslie: Not too rambling, no! Come back and read the rest of my stuff….

Trackbacks

Leave a comment, a trackback from your own site or subscribe to an RSS feed for this entry. Trackback URL for this entry Comments feed for this entry

Leave a response

Leave a URL

Preview

Links

DaveCat - Shouting to…

That’s So Dos - Spock IS Enough

Kim Ayres - rambling beard

Zuba - A Practicing Moomin

Lyvvie’s Limelight - “Turn on your lime light!”

For the Love of Rocks - Maja in AU!

Mission Statement

It is not the relish that makes this hot-dog so delicious, it is the zeal!